Why on Certain Channels Do They Show the Same Tv Episodes Over and Over Again
Does it seem similar every time you turn on the TV you encounter the same movie playing?
Information technology's not your imagination. A new study by IHS Technology is reporting that while the quantity of movie content on U.S. basic cable hit a three-year high last year, fewer unique movies were broadcast in 2013 than in the previous three years. (For a fun claiming, try to approximate the top ten virtually-played movies. Answers to follow.) In other words, the cable networks are sticking with reliable classics -- only for a few different reasons.
Source: Fox.
Second life
Showing movies every bit lead-ins for a network's original programming, or during weekends as part of a theme marathon, is cipher new. It'south a fourth dimension-tested model that works for both sides. They heave ratings for the network, and the lucrative deals behind them assist studios first a motion-picture show'due south product upkeep and reach greater profitability.
The report from the El Segundo, Calif.-based company showed that Twenty-Starting time Century Fox (FOXA) led all other studios with nearly 90,000 hours of film content being shown on cable last year. The report besides speculates that total airtime is projected to be fifty-fifty college this year and will represent an increment in both movie hours and share of airtime on Boob tube. Film consumption on basic cablevision is growing and logging more hours than ever before.
Cable leaders
Information technology'south not just Play tricks utilizing this tendency. Warner Brothers, a subsidiary of Fourth dimension Warner (TWX), besides was identified as a meaning player in this marketplace. Both have motion-picture show channels on basic cable, including Fox Movie Aqueduct and Turner Classic Movies, just they too have content channels such equally FX, TNT, and TBS that supplement their original programs and acquired serial with films.
It's no surprise FX plays a big function in this practice -- the network seems to be the leader in locking up the Television set rights to major movement pictures. Just look at 2013 when the channel picked up a slew of films, including blockbusters Human of Steel, Fast & Furious vi, World State of war Z, Despicable Me 2, and The Heat all before the summer was over. At the time of the deal FX CEO John Landgraf was quoted equally saying he expected 21 movie premieres on the FX spinoff network FXX in 2014, which is a massive number.
Rules & restrictions
The study also goes into item nearly the type of content that is more valuable. Titles from 2000 onwards are considered prime number time, but that comes with a cost. The movies in that group are more expensive and are saddled with restrictions, including a lengthy await time until a network can first air them.
Remember the standard life cycle for a moving picture is theaters, abode entertainment (VOD/DVD/Blu-Ray/streaming), premium channels (HBO/Kickoff/Starz), and then basic cable. Independent films often carry a different set of rules and the report found 78% of movies being aired in 2013 were from those studios.
Cable networks also tend to rely on classics from the '80s and '90s, as those films take looser restrictions and deport a built-in audition. In fact, half-dozen of the top x nigh shown moves on Boob tube last year came from the 1990s including the nigh watched: 1993's Mrs. Doubtfire (which not coincidentally was distributed by Fox).
The full listing, along with the number of times it ran on cable TV last twelvemonth:
ane. Mrs. Doubtfire (1993): 66
2. She'southward All That (1999): 59
3. Juno (2007): 53
4. Austin Powers in Goldmember (2002): 51
five. Water ice Age (2002): 49
vi. There's Something Virtually Mary (1998): 47
7. Sleepless in Seattle (1993): 46
viii. A Few Proficient Men (1992): 44
ix. The Shawshank Redemption (1994): 44
ten. Catwoman (2004): 44
Personally, I don't get Catwoman, simply the balance of the names look correct. Every time I run across A Few Skillful Men or The Shawshank Redemption on TV, I become sucked in for at least xv minutes.
With that in mind, this growing tendency of intense focus on a few proficient films provides the rare win-win-win scenario: for networks (which capture viewers who can't flip away before they learn if Tom Hanks and Meg Ryan go together), for studios (which get funding to make new "new classics" ... or at least we can promise), and for viewers (who tin have eye knowing Freddie Prinze, Jr. is never far away).
Source: https://www.fool.com/investing/general/2014/05/03/why-the-same-handful-of-movies-are-always-on-cable.aspx
0 Response to "Why on Certain Channels Do They Show the Same Tv Episodes Over and Over Again"
Postar um comentário